Dear Rhonda
I haven't contacted Simon for months until yesterday, when I reiterated that to him he has been served with the Section 21 Eviction Notice, a Notice to Vacate, and that if he complies with his contract and leaves on March 28th, he will receive his full deposit back and everyone will be happy. However if he does not, he will be liable for numerous costs which will probably mean he will not receive his deposit back, and will actually owe more money to me, to Olivers and to the courts.
As for Simon's "quiet enjoyment" of my home, I would like to point out that a person who voluntarily embarks upon breaking the law and invites court action must naturally expect a degree of communication from the estate agents who he has lied to, the future tenants who have now been rendered homeless by Simon's refusal to leave, and myself, who is condemned to further couchsurfing in order to fund up front the costs - eventually liable to Simon - for removing him forcibly from my home. I would say a person who invites this kind of trouble and disturbance into their lives is not someone who strikes me as one who dabbles in "quiet enjoyment", but rather one who seeks trouble, discord and gains pleasure in other people's distress and difficulties. Further, this is a man who has lied on numerous occasions. I think we need not delve further into the obvious absence of morality such a person demonstrates, but rather concentrate on removing such a person from innocent people's lives. I count myself an innocent person and wish him to leave me alone, and depart my property asap.
Until he does, I am afraid the distress Mr Simon Longo has caused will be palpably evident to all, and "quiet enjoyment" far from everyone's lives.
Ruth Fowler
As for Simon's "quiet enjoyment" of my home, I would like to point out that a person who voluntarily embarks upon breaking the law and invites court action must naturally expect a degree of communication from the estate agents who he has lied to, the future tenants who have now been rendered homeless by Simon's refusal to leave, and myself, who is condemned to further couchsurfing in order to fund up front the costs - eventually liable to Simon - for removing him forcibly from my home. I would say a person who invites this kind of trouble and disturbance into their lives is not someone who strikes me as one who dabbles in "quiet enjoyment", but rather one who seeks trouble, discord and gains pleasure in other people's distress and difficulties. Further, this is a man who has lied on numerous occasions. I think we need not delve further into the obvious absence of morality such a person demonstrates, but rather concentrate on removing such a person from innocent people's lives. I count myself an innocent person and wish him to leave me alone, and depart my property asap.
Until he does, I am afraid the distress Mr Simon Longo has caused will be palpably evident to all, and "quiet enjoyment" far from everyone's lives.
Ruth Fowler
MIMI IN NY | 1:22 PM |
